RTO Mandates: How Law Firms Are Tightening Hybrid Schedules in 2025

In 2025, the legal industry is witnessing a significant shift in work arrangements.  After years of embracing hybrid and remote work models, many law firms are now reevaluating their policies, with a noticeable trend toward increased in-office attendance.  This movement, often referred to as "return to office" (RTO), is reshaping the dynamics of legal workplaces, impacting firm culture, associate development, and talent retention.

The Shift Toward Increased Office Presence

Several prominent law firms have recently implemented policies requiring attorneys to spend more days in the office. For instance, among several Vault 100 law firms that have announced a mandatory four-day in-office schedule, one emphasized the importance of mentorship and professional development that, according to the firm, is best achieved through in-person interactions, while another adopted a Monday through Thursday in-office mandate, highlighting the need for collaborative work environments.

Other firms have followed suit, instituting four-day in-office requirements. These changes reflect a broader industry trend, with firms seeking to balance the benefits of remote work with the perceived advantages of in-person collaboration.

Rationale Behind the RTO Movement

The push for increased office attendance is driven by several factors: 

1. Mentorship and Training: Firms argue that junior attorneys benefit from direct, in-person mentorship, which is more challenging to replicate in a remote setting. 
2. Firm Culture: Maintaining a cohesive firm culture is cited as a reason for bringing attorneys back to the office, fostering a sense of community and shared purpose. 
3. Client Expectations: Some clients expect their legal teams to be readily available and collaborative, which firms believe is facilitated by in-person work.

Associate Reactions and Concerns

The response from associates to these mandates has been mixed.  While some understand the rationale, others express concerns about work-life balance and the abrupt shift from flexible arrangements.  For example, associates at one Vault 100 firm reportedly expressed dissatisfaction with the firm's five-day in-office expectation, leading to discussions about morale and retention.  

Additionally, some firms have linked office attendance to bonus eligibility, further intensifying the debate.  As an example, one firm has announced that junior lawyers' bonuses could be impacted if they fail to meet the firm's office attendance requirements.

Balancing Flexibility and Firm Needs

Not all firms are adopting stringent RTO policies. Many are striving to find a balance that accommodates both firm objectives and employee preferences. For every firm that has adopted a stringent RTO policy, there is another that has remained more flexible in keeping a hybrid or remote arrangement. Check out the Vault Law profiles for all firms you are interested in to see what their associates have to say about their in-office attendance requirements. 

***

The legal industry's approach to work arrangements is in flux, with firms reevaluating their policies to align with evolving priorities.  While the trend toward increased office attendance is gaining momentum, the future likely holds a hybrid model that balances the benefits of in-person collaboration with the flexibility that many attorneys have come to value. As firms navigate this transition, open communication and consideration of employee feedback will be crucial in shaping sustainable and effective work environments.